Former PhD Student Jingyi Huang Awarded the Allan Nevins Prize for Best Dissertation

Former UCLA economics PhD student Jingyi Huang has been awarded the Allan Nevins Prize for the best dissertation in U.S. economic history from the Economic History Association. This prize is a notable recognition of Huang’s work and puts her on the path of major contribution to the field for years to come.

After completion of her PhD in economics at UCLA in 2021, Jingyi Huang was a postdoc at Harvard for the 2021-2022 school year and is now an assistant professor at Brandeis University.

More information about the Economics History Association can be found here.

Previous winners of the award can be found here.

 

Michael Rubens Named Young Economists´ Essay Award Winner by EARIE

Michael Rubens won the 2022 Young Economists´ Essay Award Winner presented by the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE).

The Young Economists´ Essay Award is awarded annually to 3 authors under the age of 35, who are less than 5 years from their PhD defense, during EARIE’s annual conference.

More information about the award and EARIE can be found here.

The Economic Cost of OPEC’s Control of Global Oil

John Asker

John Asker

By John Asker

OPEC, the global cartel of oil producing countries, led by Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states, controls approximately 50% of the world’s oil reserves. In (Mis)Allocation, Market Power and Global Oil Extraction (American Economic Review, 109(4), 1568-1615, 2019) and The Welfare Impact of Market Power: The OPEC Cartel (work in progress) Professor John Asker and coauthors examine the impact of OPEC’s market power in the modern era. Using detailed data on almost every known oil field in the world they build a detailed model of the cost structure underlying the world crude oil market. They use this model, combined with an economic theory of market equilibrium, to examine what the world market for crude oil would look like absent OPEC’s coordinating influence.

As one would expect, OPEC has a large impact on the world oil markets. That said, the magnitude of OPEC impact is startling. Between 1970 and 2014, Professor Asker’s research indicates that OPEC imposed a total economic cost of 5.7 trillion US dollars. For comparison, the comparable value of global output (GDP) in a single year is 77 trillion US dollars. If a typical recession is associated with a 3% drop in GDP, OPEC’s exercise of market power since 1970 has imposed an economic cost equivalent to one 2.5-year global recession.

The economic cost of this exercise of market power comes from two sources. First, when production from low-cost oil fields is reduced, higher cost fields substitute for at least some of that production. This imposes an economic cost through increasing the resource cost of existing production. Second, when market power is wielded, prices increase due to insufficient supply being delivered to meet demand. This means gains from trade can be unrealized (consumers have unmet demand despite their willingness to pay being higher than the cost of supplying them). About 85% of the economic costs of OPEC activity is estimated to come from gains from trade that are not realized due to OPECs desire to distort prices above competitive levels.

This work sheds light on the operation of the global oil market – which is economically significant in itself – but also underscores the macroeconomic impact of the exercise of market power generally. This contributes to an ongoing re-evaluation within economics of the role of microeconomic market imperfections (like market power) on aggregate economic outcomes. OPEC influence over the global crude market is a compelling example of how the accumulation of market power in globally significant markets can impose economic costs on society that reach macroeconomic significance.

Valentina Glaviano

Valentina Glaviano

Valentina Glaviano grew up in Sacramento, California in a first-generation Italian American household. In high school, she was a stellar student and was admitted into plenty of colleges come senior year. The commitment process, however, was what she described as conservative. In addition to weighing academics, she had to choose a school that she could afford. As a California resident, UCLA became the obvious choice.

Coming into college, Valentina had tremendous clarity regarding what she wanted to pursue over the next four years. From a young age, she was set on working in the financial services industry because she viewed smart investing, along with education, as a massive equalizer that helps bring people out of poverty. Growing up, her parents were good investors, which allowed them to pay for her high school education at a private college prep school. In a similar manner, she too wanted to make a transformational difference in people’s lives by providing financial returns.

In order to pursue this goal, she chose to study economics. She was particularly attracted to UCLA’s economics program due to its focus on broad international themes. According to Valentina, at the time, “economic theory mainly focused on money supply” which is where UCLA was able to differentiate itself. 

In order to maximize the value she could obtain from her degree, Valentina’s college experience was primarily focused on two things. First, of course, was schoolwork. She described the classes she took as being directly applicable to the work she would go on to do in asset management. The second thing she devoted attention to was her job, which she took up in order to pay for tuition and rent. To get the most out of her time, she opted to apply for a commissioned sales position instead of one with only an hourly wage. In this position, she picked up valuable skills, which would help her land a job in finance upon graduation. She treated each sale much like a challenge and learned that one must take a fearless approach. Valentina described this process as the “hunt” and stressed that in order to be successful, one must thoroughly enjoy hunting.

When it came time to look for a full-time job, her sales skills translated to conquering a fear of rejection and being relentless when networking with professionals in the financial services industry. Even though she was not a member of any business club like so many economics students are now, she was still able to build a network of connections on her own. This allowed her to get a job in investment management upon graduation, and she has been working in finance ever since. Such an industry is notorious for its long hours, especially for analysts fresh out of college. Her advice to avoid feeling overwhelmed is that one must first “work in finance for the right reasons”, meaning they must actually want to help people. Those who enter for the lucrative compensation “rarely succeed long term”. 

Valentina’s own passion for helping others through finance continues to motivate her through her busy workdays. Valentina wakes up at around 5:30 am, starting her day off with an early morning workout. If she finds herself in the office that day, then she will generally be attending several back-to-back meetings in which she meets with team members on the various projects that she is leading. On the other hand, if she is traveling that day, she expects to primarily meet with prospective clients to demonstrate why her firm’s outsourced CIO approach aligns with the missions and values of the client. She emphasized the extensive research necessary to prepare for her meetings, including material that might sound familiar to business economics students. Valentina pulls balance sheets, income statements, and annual reports in order to analyze metrics like the variability of income, the stress of the balance sheet, and spending deficit. Ultimately, she ends the work day feeling fulfilled from rising up the challenge of her job and from the satisfaction that her work is helping improve the life of many others.

Simon Board Awarded Spring 2022 Warren C. Scoville Distinguished Teaching Award

Simon Board won the Spring 2022 Warren C. Scoville Distinguished Teaching Award for his new class “Econ 106S: Competitive Strategy”. This class uses a combination of economic principles and case studies to discuss the economic forces underlying successful business strategy. Specifically, it teaches students to identify sources of sustainable competitive advantage and to understand the dynamics of strategic interaction between firms. The class covers topics such as economics of scale, network effects, switching costs, and platform markets. Simon Board is the Benjamin Graham Centennial Chair of Value Investing at UCLA.